This blog has moved to: xyfeminist.wordpress.com!

All content and comments have been moved to the new blog. Please update your links and bookmarks.
I will leave the old site up for now, but no new content will be added here and comments have been locked.


November 27, 2008

Happy Thanksgiving, While it's Still Legal

"If the anti-Christmas forces are winning, then the war in Iraq is nothing short of total victory."
~Ruth Marcus in The Washington Post


On Wednesday, November 26th, 2008, the day before Thanksgiving, I saw the following on the way to my parent's house:
  • An aisle at Wallgreens full of Christmas lights, decorations, dancing Santas, and Christmas candy. The aisle was stocked on November 1st, before the Halloween candy even had time to cool.
  • A department store display full of stylized Christmas trees and skimpy red and green outfits for women.
  • Three Salvation Army bell ringers, also in red and green.
  • Tinsel and a "Merry Christmas" sign at a Dunkin Donuts.
  • A street performer playing Deck the Halls on a fiddle.
I did not see any of the following:
  • A "Happy Thanksgiving" sign.
  • A turkey, or even a stylized depiction of one.
  • A "Happy Thanksgiving" Hallmark card.

My friends, the War on Thanksgiving is upon us! Bill O'Riley proves that it's all part of the regressive sectarian agenda to get secular holidays out of the public square in order to marginalize secular humanism. Just look at what happened with the Taliban in Afghanistan: once you get secular humanism out of the way, then you can pass regressive sectarian programs like arranged marriages, the criminalization of contraception, forced domesticity on women, the legalization of hate crimes, and the rise of violent turf battles between murderous egotistical dudes who formed rival denominations.

Or maybe the retail tentacle of the megatheocorporatocracy is desperate for some rampant shallow consumerism after the economy imploded, and Bill O'Riley is a deluded priggish asshole. [1]


Happy T-Day everyone, enjoy it while it lasts. ;-)



[1] This is the proper use of the word priggish (see the definition).

Copyright November 2008 by F*ck M*sculinity

November 11, 2008

Yet More Fraud in the Fashion Industry


#47 - All Things Designed By Men, For Men

In Short:
Everything from car seats to women's fashion is designed for men's desires. Men's bodies are the default template for all products, and men's desires are the primary requirements for any design, even when that design will only be used by women.

Derived From:
#8 - Privilege to Make the Rules
#14 - Men are the Default Gender
#15 - Privilege of Unquestioned Majority
#17 - Primacy of Men's Comfort
#43 - Men in Business
#44 - Men in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM)

Exclusive to Men Because:
All "unisex" products, from sweatshirts, to the placement of gas pedals on cars, to the height of kitchen cabinets, are designed for men's body sizes and frames. Any product designed exclusively for women (such as, oh, women's fashion) is designed for the men who will interact with the woman who purchases the product. The women who actually use the product are overlooked.

Harms:
Ignoring women's material needs marginalizes half of the people in a consumer culture.

Dismissing the discretionary income of female consumers cuts hugely into a company's profits. All the half-assed patronizing ad campaigns in the world will not bring half of the population around to a product that was never designed with them in mind. While many companies feel that they can afford to ignore the female market [see: #15 - Privilege of Unquestioned Majority], the opportunity costs are much higher than they realize.

The damage caused to women by harmful products, from ankle-breaking shoes to lead in lipstick, is deliberately ignored and left unaddressed.

If You are a Good Guy:
Realize that products are rarely designed with women in mind, and pay extra attention to the few companies that actually cater to women. When buying stuff for women, avoid the cheaply-made pink-coded knockoffs of products originally designed for men. In some cases, especially for tall women, the male-designated non-pink products will fit better than the cheap pink imitations.

On a similar note, don't get bent out of shape when your female relations buy unisex clothes from the guy's clothing department. It should be no surprise that women will buy the guy's stuff when it fits better and is made better.

If you're one of the few who actually design products for a living, then put down the 5'8" broad-shouldered default "average person" schematic for a moment and actually test your new product on some potential female customers.

And yes, women's public bathrooms need to have twice the square footage of men's restrooms. That's not reverse-sexism; that's biological necessity until the day that they finally make urinals socially acceptable for women to use. If you're a good guy, stop obsessing over the square footage, and instead count the number of things you can pee in. You will quickly realize that men's restrooms everywhere have double the capacity of women's restrooms. So when the foreman on your building project swaps the men's and women's restroom signs (because he enjoys watching women stand cross-legged in long lines while he strolls into a vast warehouse of urinals) fire his ass and put the signs back.

Part 1 - The Con of the Fashion Industry

All Things Designed By Men, For Men (Part 1):
Yet More Fraud in the Fashion Industry


"Before, cheap clothes looked cheap. Today, it's nearly impossible to see the difference, and that's what we are trying to prove."
~Jorgen Andersson, Brand and New Business Director, H&M


In case you didn't realize it already, not only is the entire fashion industry designed to crush women's spirits (through the constant bombardment of ads and social pressure mandating women to conform to the multitude of demeaning and contradictory archetypes assigned to the sex class by men) they're also ripping you off BIG TIME in the process!

Brands like Prada, Gucci and Louis Vuitton are owned by vicious moguls that make Ebenezer Scrooge look like a philanthropist. They hire scumbags from the porn industry to design their clothing, slap some calf skin together with a lot of glue using horrifically abused women and children in China, and then sell the crap to rich women at ten times the cost of manufacture.

All in a day's work for the Patriarchy.

For the full story, pick up Dana Thomas's book Deluxe: How Luxury Lost Its Luster. Or, get the Cliffs Notes from NPR's interview with Dana Thomas.

And when you're done, play this quick game of "What's Wrong With This Picture"! All you have to do is find 5 things that are wrong with the following picture:

Think you have it? Check your guesses against the answers below.

  1. Ridiculous cleavage: Shaving even a few inches of fabric from each dress can save a company millions over an entire production line. Couple that with fashion designers from the porn industry, and you have a guarantee that skimpy sexist outfits sold at ten times the cost of manufacture will be around for a long, long time.
  2. Bye-bye buttons: Just as removing fabric from a dress can save a company millions of dollars, removing double-stitching and "extras" like buttons and zippers saves a bundle too, all while increasing the likelihood of Dude-demanded nip-slips. Prepare youselves for the sack-with-a-rope dress in a few more years, except that rope is expensive. Maybe they'll use dental floss instead?
  3. Handbags! Handbags! Handbags! Handbags! Women's clothing comes in several (usually unhelpful) sizes. While the one-number clothing system is already a huge hassle for women, it still doesn't bring enough profits to the Dudes. At the end of a clothing season, designer stores have to write down unsold garments in sizes that nobody wanted. Handbags, on the other hand, come in just one size for all customers, so there is no leftover stock for stores to eat. And if you make the bag from scraps, spit, glue, and slave labor, you have a guaranteed profit maker! Except, how do you get women to obsessively buy tons of unneeded handbags? Excessive marketing!! This picture was taken in front of the Louis Vuitton store in the Prudential Mall in Boston:
    You can then require a different handbag for every single outfit that you make. Then flood the market with advertisements [1] showing models happily frolicking about (as much as one can frolic in stilettos) with four handbags at a time. Just bury yourself up to your armpits in handbags whenever you go out! Not only will you make the fashion industry a ton of money, but you'll be a walking Christmas tree for purse snatchers!
  4. Stiletto Heels on a brick sidewalk: Anyone who has walked around the brick sidewalks of a college campus in heels knows that it is a good way to make a date with an ankle cast.
  5. Kittens don't use rifles.



[1] Trust me, after reading this post, you too will start to notice the marauding handbag ads that are everywhere these days!


Copyright June 2008 by F*ck M*sculinity

November 2, 2008

The Privilege Dictionary


Part 1 - "Seminal"
Part 2 - The Privilege Dictionary
Part 3 - How Do You Swear at a Straight White Man?


The Privilege of Vocabulary (Part 2):
The Privilege Dictionary


It's easier to debate any concept when all the pertinent terms are defined in your gender's favor. Here's my growing list of phallocentric and hypermasculine propaganda words that would make George Orwell proud [1].


The List of Ridiculous Boy Words
  • Poaching Aunt Ethel's wireless Internet = War Driving

  • Prepubescent boys watching prostitution-based sex class propaganda on the web after entering 01/01/1900 as their date of birth = Mature Audiences Only

  • The hypothesis that life originated elsewhere in the universe and was delivered to Earth through a processes akin to seeds and spores, and certainly not by the dispersal of non-viable gametes from males = Panspermia (S)

  • Fellow - Your companion, comrade, associate, equal or peer. Also means man. There is only once gender for which these two definitions do not inherently conflict, and that is intentional.

Feel free to add your own! Post your suggestions in the comments, and I'll add them to the list.



(S) - Denotes yet another sperm-centric word that would be incredibly silly if 99% of our society didn't take it so seriously.


[1] That is, if he wasn't sexist. Orwell missed the great irony of 1984; that such a dystopian system already existed on Earth right under his nose, yet completely out of his perception because he so thoroughly bought into the tenets of Patriarchy.

Copyright June 2008 by F*ck M*sculinity

November 1, 2008

"Adult" Halloween


#6 - The Male Gaze

In Short:
Men's sexual perspective normalizes the dehumanization of women and girls, and inoculates men from being dehumanized themselves.

Derived From:
#5 - All Women are Sexual Prospects
#8 - Privilege to Make the Rules
#4 - Privilege of Violence
#3 - Prostitution
#2 - Ownership of Women's Bodies

Exclusive to Men Because:
Men, as a class, are protected from dehumanization while women, as a class, are not. Society condemns anyone who might possibly sexualize men (most notably gay men and the infamous "cougars"), while entire industries are set up to encourage the rampant sexualization of women and young girls.

Harms:
A society that does not see women as people will not work to protect them under human rights laws. Thus, the Male Gaze facilitates the systemic worldwide rape, torture, and murder of women, by laying the attitudes and mind-sets needed for governments and organizations ruled by men to ostensibly condone the abuse of women.

If You are a Good Guy:
You will not objectify women, period!

Out of respect for her humanity, you will not glare at the breasts, ass or any other part of any woman's body. At no point will you judge a woman, favorably or unfavorably, by her physical body, ignoring the multifaceted person in front of you who happens to have a female body. And if you resent a woman's mind for preventing you from having sexual access to her body, you will do us all favor by shoving your head (either one) into a wood chipper.



The Male Gaze (Part 1):
"Adult" Halloween


"If you get picked up by the fuzz at the local middle school...we never met."
~ScarePros.com, referring to their lineup of costumes for adults.


If an office mate's Halloween party is any indication, there is absolutely no distinction between a female adult's Halloween costume and an "adult" movie [1].

And if the Halloween costume industry is any indication, the distinction between a little girl's Halloween costume and an "adult" movie is also blurring fast.

To see what I mean, take a look yourself at the shit they're doing to girls and women. (NOTE: All costumes shown were labeled as Halloween costumes, not lingerie [2].)


Minnie Mouse (Fun Warehouse and The Garment District):


















The Little Mermaid (Disney and The Garment District):




















French Maid (FancyDress and The Garment District):


















Cheetah (Amazon.com and HalloweenAdventures):





















Snow White (Disney and ScarePros.com):





















Rainbow Brite (CostumeCraze and The Garment District) [3] :





















Wendy (MissEm, BuyCostumes.com and BuyCostumes.com) [4] :






















There are hundreds of other examples, but I'm going to vomit if I do any more.

Whether the adult costume designers are copying the kid's costumes, or vice-versa, the result is the same: little girls' Halloween costumes are being heavily sexualized in an effort to indoctrinate girls into a pornulated future while they are young and impressionable. This is very similar to the disturbing trends of Japanese cosplay, which encourage pedophilia [5], female slavery [6], and the dehumanization of women.



[1] That's not entirely true, as there is one distinction: the office guys have to pay to see "adult" movies, while seeing the genitalia of their office coworkers on Halloween
is free. (And don't even get me started on the bullshit of calling pornography an "adult" entertainment. [See #61 - The Privilege of Vocabulary].)
[2] The costumes labeled as lingerie are far worse.
[3] The adult version of the Rainbow Brite Costume is called "Rainbow Bride" because brides and sexual slaves are synonymous in Dude's minds [See #10 - Privilege of Marriage].
[4] Costume designers put a lot of effort into carefully transitioning girls from child motifs, through the misogynist-ladened teen years, and into the pornunlated outfits they're expected to wear as adults.
[5] To quote Tara Meacham at Associated Content:
"Young children, for example, may be attracted to the idea of dressing up as a Sailor Moon character (Sailor Moon is a popular anime in which the main characters are school girls). However, some young men, teenaged and older, hold a sexual interest for young and mature women who dress up as these characters. Sailor Moon in society, therefore, serves as quality entertainment for children, but also as a fetish for some adults."
[6] The thankfully defunct iMaid cosplay cafe in Toronto is one of the more overt examples of men glorifying female slavery:
"Asian girls dressed in revealing, frilly maid outfits, who will greet customers with a "Welcome home, master," bowing deeply, hands clasped. In one cafe, maids get down on their knees to stir the cream and sugar into the customer's coffee."



Copyright June 2008 by F*ck M*sculinity